Elizabeth Warren using policy proposals to stand out Sen. Elizabeth Warren has a plan to prepare the military for climate change and minimize its carbon footprint, too.
The Senate Armed Services Committee member and 2020 presidential candidate didnt give a number on how much the plan would cost to implement, but its on top of hundreds of billions already allocated for the various other policies shes proposed since she entered the campaign. Warren has said her tax on the super-rich would fund those plans and leave plenty for more. Her campaign did not immediately respond to questions about the funding of the military climate proposal.
Like many of Warrens proposals, the military climate policy was pegged to a bill, this one co-sponsored by Texas Democratic Rep. Veronica Escobar. The bill calls for the military to reach zero carbon emissions for all non-combat bases and infrastructure by 2030. Thats an ambitious goal considering that the U.S. actually increased carbon emissions last year, according to the Rhodium Group.
“In short, climate change is real, it is worsening by the day, and it is undermining our military readiness. And instead of meeting this threat head-on, Washington is ignoring it – and making it worse,” Warren wrote in a Wednesday Medium post.
Video: Tucker: Beto has changed
Warren reveals plan for U.S. military to combat climate change
Warren also wants to create a dedicated source of funding to transition to bases and charge a one-percent fee from contractors hired by the Department of Defense that dont meet emission standards.
MSNBC Host Says Fox News Parrots Trumps Racism Like a Bunch of Dupes but Elizabeth Warren Should Do Town Hall
The Massachusetts senator also argues that the military is not prepared for the damage climate change can do to its bases. She points to the aircraft hangers torn apart by Hurricane Michael at Tyndall Air Force Base in Florida last year and to the flooded buildings at Offutt Air Force Base in Nebraska last month.
“Time and time again, senior military leaders have warned Congress of the national security challenge that climate change poses,” Warren wrote.
Video: What is Democratic socialism?
The plan would, “invest billions of dollars into a new, ten-year research and development program at the Defense Department focused on microgrids and advanced energy storage.” Microgrids are miniature versions of the electric grids that power our cities and towns. They power a far smaller space, but they can be connected to sustainable power source and can keep the power on in a few buildings when theres a major outage.
Warren releases plan to tackle climate change threats to military | TheHill
To ensure the Pentagon complies, Warren calls for the Secretary of Defense to appoint a senior official to “to ensure that, top to bottom, our military is prioritizing the climate threat” and for the Defense Department to produce an annual report evaluating the climate vulnerability of every base.
I dont generally see politicians as role models, but theres at least one example they should set: that you dont just shun your opponents, you debate them.
On Tuesday, the Alabama state senate passed H.B. 314 by a 25-6 vote with one abstention. The bill establishes the legal personhood of unborn children and prohibits nearly all abortion. If Republican governor Kay Ivey signs the legislation — which the bills supporters anticipate — it would be the strictest pro-life law in the entire country, though it is highly unlikely that it would survive the inevitable legal challenge from abortion-rights groups.
I was very sorry to see Democratic presidential candidate Senator Elizabeth Warren turn down Foxs offer to have her own Town Hall.
The bill first received national attention earlier this month, when Democratic state representative John Rogers made a gruesome remark explaining his opposition to the bill. Some kids are unwanted, Rogers said. So you kill them now or you kill them later. You bring them into the world unwanted, unloved, then send them to the electric chair.
Rogers was roundly and rightly criticized for his comments, including by Alabamas Democratic senator Doug Jones — though Rogers attests that the senator (who was once Rogerss attorney) called to tell him privately that he agreed with him but had to condemn him publicly. Jones denies this contention. Rogers announced last week that hell challenge Jones for his Senate seat.
Alabamas effort to pass H. B. 314 takes place against the backdrop of nationwide contention over abortion policy. So far this year, Democratic legislatures in New York, Illinois, Virginia, Rhode Island, Vermont, Nevada, and New Mexico are considering or have passed bills to legalize abortion or loosen abortion restrictions during the last three months of pregnancy.
Meanwhile, in red states such as Ohio, Mississippi, Kentucky, and Georgia, legislatures have passed so-called heartbeat bills, which prohibit abortion after a fetal heartbeat can be detected, usually at about six weeks gestation. The most recent of these bills, signed by Georgia governor Brian Kemp last week, has faced significant backlash, including a wide range of media coverage insisting that the legislation would prosecute women for having miscarriages and imprison post-abortive women for life — neither of which accurately reflects the substance of the bill. Our own David French has a great summary of why those interpretations are incorrect.
Both heartbeat bills and stricter abortion restrictions such as Alabamas have little chance of being upheld by courts given the current framework of abortion-rights jurisprudence instantiated by Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey. But the scathing media coverage that these pro-life laws receive — compared to laws that allow abortion for any reason, even after fetuses are developed enough to survive outside the womb — is telling.
Video: Trump slams report of plan to send 120K troops to Middle East
In a Twitter thread on Tuesday, Massachusetts senator and Democratic presidential hopeful Elizabeth Warren announced that she had declined an invitation from Fox News to take part in a town-hall event and called the network a hate-for-profit racket. Heres part of what she tweeted:
Fox News is a hate-for-profit racket that gives a megaphone to racists and conspiracists—its designed to turn us against each other, risking life and death consequences, to provide cover for the corruption thats rotting our government and hollowing out our middle class.
I wont ask millions of Democratic primary voters to tune into an outlet that profits from racism and hate in order to see our candidates, Warren added in a subsequent tweet. She also touted her many media appearances, claiming to have taken more than 1,100 press questions since January.
Call it a principled stand, but her principles are grounded in over-generalization rather than facts. And, as seems to characterize much of her grandstanding lately, Warrens stunt is powered by a healthy dose of delusion. Does the senator really believe that her decision not to appear on Fox will have a noticeable effect on the networks advertising revenue?
Of course not. Its progressive virtue-signaling, the latest in a long line of decisions from Warren that do little to mark her as a serious politician or contender but a lot to reveal her desperation, as she struggles to rise from the middle of the Democratic pack.
Aside from being facially ridiculous, though, her rejection of Foxs invitation also might have been a tactical error. Vermont senator Bernie Sanders accepted an invitation from the network in mid April and his appearance was widely considered to have been a resounding success, especially given that some of his rhetoric and policies seem to echo Trumps, appealing to working-class voters in a way few other Democratic candidates are capable of doing. In fact, a brand-new Morning Consult poll of Democratic-primary voters shows that Fox News viewers are more likely to back Sanders than are MSNBC viewers.
Minnesota senator Amy Klobuchar has also already participated in a town-hall event on the conservative network. Not two days after Bernies Fox town hall, failed Senate candidate and former Texas representative Beto ORourke — another Democratic primary contender flailing in the dense mire of the middle-ten candidates — said hed be willing to appear on the network, too.
South Bend mayor Pete Buttigieg, who has dropped in polls recently but remains in contention, also agreed to appear on Fox shortly after the Sanders event. He already has a town hall slated, for this coming Sunday evening, May 19. Even Kirsten Gillibrand, whos trying to position herself as one of the most progressive candidates in the field, has a Fox town hall scheduled for early June.
But perhaps Warren is content with her decision. To some extent, her effort at virtue-signaling appears to be working: Media Matters president Angelo Carusone praised her decision to reject Fox, calling the network a destructive, bigoted political-propaganda operation.
Maybe thats a win. Warren appears to be running a campaign to appeal to Media Matters, and hardly anyone else.
New polling from OHPI finds that former vice president Joe Biden is leading President Trump by five points in Arizona, 49 to 44 percent. In the 2016 general election, Trump won the states eleven electoral votes by a margin of 3.5 percentage points over Hillary Clinton.
The OHPI survey tested the top six Democratic candidates against the Republican president — Bernie Sanders, Kamala Harris, Pete Buttigieg, Beto ORourke, and Elizabeth Warren — and found that Biden was the only one leading Trump. Warren was the next closest, coming in with 42 percent to Trumps 47.
Heres what National Journal politics editor Josh Kraushaar had to say about the poll this morning:
In recent years, Republicans have struggled to balance the energy of their activist base with the pragmatism necessary to win over [Arizonas] critical mass of suburban independents.
At the same time, Democrats are eyeing Arizona as a critical political prize that could make or break their national ambitions. Win Arizona, and the party could withstand a Rust Belt stumble in Wisconsin. . . .
There have been some troubling signs for Arizona Republicans in recent weeks. A statewide poll showed Joe Biden leading Trump by 5 points—with the president failing to hit 50 percent against any of the prospective Democratic challengers (including Bernie Sanders). . . .
Joe Biden would create a real race here in Arizona, said Arizona-based GOP operative Barrett Marson. Theres substantial dissatisfaction with the president among independents and Republican-leaners. . . .
The upcoming elections in Arizona will also be a test of the salience of two key issues driving Arizona politics: immigration and gun control. Both issues have traditionally played to the GOPs advantage.
Given that Biden is leading the Democratic field by a substantial margin in nearly every national poll, and most polls out of states with early primaries, this latest general-election survey will likely make Trump supporters a little uneasy.